The Effectiveness of Anti-Smoking Ads in Reducing the Number of Smokers

In this short essay about smoking we will find out whether anti-smoking ads help reduce the number of people who start smoking. Anti-smoking ads are effective in minimizing the number of people who smoke because it is developed to contradict pro-cigarette strengths and increase health statements throughout the community.  According to some studies, tobacco products are addictive because they contain nicotine. Most of tobacco's harm to our health does not become noticeable in years or even decades after the first usage. And while it kills 5.4 million people a year worldwide, people still say that they use tobacco for several different justifications like stress relief, pleasure, or in social situations. On average, smokers were exposed to more than 200 anti-smoking ads during the years, as calculated by televised gross rating points. But are anti smoking ads effective? In my essay I argue that anti-smoking ads reduce the number of people who start smoking.

American Journal of Public Health announced that 1,491 adult smokers over 24 months had a status of quitting and follow-up to exposure to anti-smoking ads in 2 years. The movement called, 'Cigarettes Are Eating You Alive', started venting on national television channels on August 15. It is constructed to motivate smokers on quitting and favor the Philippines smoke-free laws. It is also made to support the precise implementation of graphic health warnings on cigarette packs. The anti-smoking ads are the government's strategy to help smokers eventually stop smoking. Interviewing some people who smoke is a direct way of acquiring evidence that concludes anti-smoking ads somehow injected fear in them and made them decide to gradually stop smoking. The purpose of the ads is shown on different sides, but its main target is to reduce smoking from every individual. Anti-smoking ads also help people to decide on whether they should continue smoking or not. Legislators and public health officials are currently debating whether anti-smoking ads be recognized as a potential to be an attainable and cost-effective hindrance to youth smoking. Televised anti-smoking campaigns provide an effective population, wide method of deterring smoking uptake, stimulating adult smoking cessation, and decreasing adult smoking prevalence. Research also indicates that some types of ads may be more productive than others. In total, 35.2% of the respondents reported noticing anti-smoking advertising in the last six months in at least one channel, while only 2.4% reported being exposed to all six channels. Reviews of the impacts of anti-smoking advertising have concluded that advertisements that stimulate strong emotional responses through unfavorable visceral imagery or personal stories about the health consequences of smoking can increase awareness, produce greater memory and appeal, and influence smoking beliefs and motives. Ads that contain personalized stories about the effects of smoking and quitting hold stake for efforts to promote smoking cessation and reduce socio-economic distinctions in smoking. The overall findings from this research reveal the statistics indicating the current smoking has decreased from 20.9% in 2005 to 14.0% in 2019, and the proportion of every smoker who has quit increased. This proves that anti-smoking advertising has a positive impact on smokers with the result of increasing quit attempts. In addition, after 18 months, 9.8% of successfully re-interviewed smokers had stopped and 4.3% of ex-smokers had relapsed.

Some people think anti-smoking advertising was usually not effective, majorly because advertising messages generally encouraged consumption rather than discouraged consumption. Some people's perspectives are different from what the ad's main point is. But the fact that many smokers had stopped already due to anti-smoking ads is already a big part of this opposition. The purpose of the ads is shown on different sides, but its main target is to reduce the number of smokers. On the other hand, some oppose anti-smoking ads because fear-based anti-smoking ads are ineffective, especially if the smoker derives their self-esteem from smoking. After all, it 'makes them look cool'. This one is a highly understandable yet unsophisticated reason. We all know smoking causes health complications and therefore doesn't bring you any good but then again, people's perspectives are different. People with this mindset are only a few to count, it does not affect the fact that anti-smoking ads lessenminimize the number of people who started smoking.

In general, my opinion in this essay about smoking was confirmed. It may be said that Anti Smoking ads help reduce the number of people who started smoking. It also helps people to decide on whether they should continue smoking or not. The ad's objective is shown on several viewpoints, but its main purpose is to minimize the number of people who smoke in the process of media platforms. 'The best time to quit smoking was the day you started, the second-best time to quit is today.'