Emotion and Intensity: How We Can Read Our Emotions

Can we have valid and reliable evidence proving that there is a Universal language? Can a person know another person's emotion by observing the different levels of eye intensity? Is eye intensity a universal language? Eye intensity is the brightness and ambiguous intensity of looking. Eye intensity is a measurable strength or weakness such as force, or brightness. 

There have been many facial expressions studies done to understand emotions and communication. How accurate are facial expressions alone? Ekman and Friesen researched facial expressions and emotions. The study was done on 189 children and adults. During the study subjects had to identify emotions (sad, anger, happy, surprise, fear, disgust) through photographs. The future study will be similar because the new study will also use trial and error. One part of this study that lacked was that it showed a small emotional story that was presented with facial expressions. The reason this study was limited because the stories describe the facial expression being depicted. For the expression happy His friends have come, and he is happy. Ekman and Friesen whole goal was to see if Easterners and Westerners could Identify facial expressions and emotions. The result showed facial expressions could be identified. The study had some limitations because the descriptive story with facial expression gave the participants the answer. Are facial expressions universal enough? Ekman and Friesen's hypothesis were true, but the detailed description hindered the experiment. The results are not accurate enough to say that facial expressions are universal. We know that facial expression does give us some nonverbal combination but not enough. Jack, R.E., Garrod, and Schyns proved that Ekman and Friesen's hypothesis was wrong. The research found that facial expressions are not universal but are culturally justified. In the study, there were 30 Westerners and Easterners who view 3Dfaces on a computer screen. 15 white individuals and 15 Asians the scientist needed to demonstrate that outward appearance is not all-inclusive/universal. The members needed to scale each photo and put it into a classification of 6 feelings. The outcome demonstrates that force/intensity in Asians' eyes demonstrates their sentiments. The examination brings up more issues about my exploration. Can eye intensity be the real inclusive language?

Researchers have revealed to us that non-verbal correspondence is essential. With new information, we will be able to figure out how we all can communicate with each other. In another research analyst, N'dayie and Sanders accepted that apparent self-significance of frightful countenances would be on the higher range with a turned away looked while however direct look would be progressively pertinent for furious. There was a total of 24 members the analysts utilized a 3D facial animation illustrations structure, which was made through FAC. FAC is an animated facial expression system. The members had three feelings to look over (fear, anger, happy) and two intensities (mild versus intensity). The analysts took a gander at the action in the amygdala. Averted gazed meant fearful and direct gaze meant angry. The scientists accepted that self-pertinence of frightful appearances would produce higher due to the turned away gaze. It was alternately not the same as angry faces. The immediate look is progressively significant for irate countenances. The researcher observed the example of association for feeling power appraisals. The specialist additionally utilized an fMRI that saw the movement in the amygdala alongside different pieces of the mind. The outcome demonstrates the amygdala in the appraisals of self-relevancy and that articulation pays a considerable job in feelings and looks connections. From this examination, we realize that there are different degrees of eye looks. With eye staring, specialists realize that with a turned away look mean frightful and direct look indicates more outrage. This examination was having the option to demonstrate that intensity does have a method for imparting feelings however is anger and fear are the main two that can be seen through eye force?

The eye has numerous methods for nonverbal correspondence. During a time and weakness study, specialist Nguyen broke down 47 subjects ages. The analyst utilized an eye-gazing tracker which recorded the look of the members left the eye as they took a gander at pictures on a computer screen. The scientist needed to examine judgment. Could the subjects see facial signs to make decisions on how worn out or how old a face shows up? What does an individual take a gander at to decide an individual's weakness and age? In the researchers the participants gendered at eye region to decide if an individual was exhaustion. The members took a gander at the eye district than the cheeks to survey fatigue. Study stats reveal to me that humans look at the eyes to decide how an individual feel. This investigation demonstrates that the eye region shows exhaustion and age. What else can the eye appear? Each examination demonstrated that feelings could be resolved through the eyes.

Faces are all over the place. Animated characters are seen all over internet. On an animated face, would participants be able to determine what feelings are being portrayed to be inhibited through outward appearances? The researchers Bartneck and Breeman wanted to know about being able to comprehend animated faces. In animated children's film and shows, the maker of the movements gives the character human expressions and eye intensities. Will the character's facial expression correlate with human expressions? characters can have various embodiments. The scientist utilized 56 subjects that had to watch a screen character that was an automated character. The examination explored if a member realizes what passionate articulation in being perceived. The members were approached to rate the force/intensity for the seven feelings (contempt, anger, fear, disgust, happiness, sadness, and surprise) on an 11-point scale. The material utilized was an Act that was utilized, and the Icat communicates sentiments/feelings). The outcomes demonstrate no contrast between intensity and acknowledgment between invented characters and a screen character. Is the ability to convey feeling the energy in the character's eyes? this study has some reliability because participants can tell an emotion from an Artificial character expression and eye force. Animated character are shown all over the world in different languages and cultures. Similar eye power is authenticated in Disney films. Disney movies have appeared all over the globe. Do different societies comprehend the feelings of animated characters? Considering intensity, it will enable watchers to check whether they comprehend the right feeling.

Ursula Hess, Sylvie Blairy, and Robert E. Kleck studied on the force/intensity emotional facial expressions and decoding accuracy. Decoding accuracy means interpreting the right answer. The main inquiry is how the perception of the intensity of the emotional state attributed to a person related to the physical intensity of an expression? The second question is how are both the physical and the perceived intensity of the expression related to the accuracy of decoding the abstract aspect of the expression? The participants needed to get to expressions from four feelings anger, disgust, sadness, and happiness. There were 12 women and 12 men from Dartmouth College. This study was a very small and limited study. The stimulus material was the outward appearance of anger, disgust, sadness, and happiness. The outward appearance comprised of two male Caucasians on-screen characters and two female Caucasian on-screen characters. There were 6 unique degrees of intensity to look over. The power levels were made by utilizing realistic transforming programs. There were 12 men and 12 women that evaluated every one of the received intensities of the fundamental feeling and for the subjective idea of the feeling communicated. The outward appearances and feeling being communicated hade to be rated by the participants. Total of 96 stimuli that presented itself for 5 seconds. This is where the study has some limits because is 5 seconds long enough to have a valid understanding. This study also used a 7- emotional model (anger, contempt, disgust, fear, happiness, sadness, and surprise). On the final round subjects will rate how hard it was to rate emotions. The results showed that a person's perceived intensity was linear with the physical intensity of the expression. The more intense the facial expression meant higher intensity rating. The emotion category translates accuracy that is varied linearly with the physical intensity of emotions for expressions (anger, disgust, and sadness). Happiness was detectable. Sex contrasts were concluded. Sex of encoder conveyed tremendous effects for both ward measures. The motivation behind this investigation was to breaks down and assess the impact of the power of enthusiastic articulations saw force in the passionate state and comprehend exactness. The first finding was the apparent force compared with the controlled physical power of expression. Powerless articulations(expressions) were viewed as reflecting frail emotions states while forceful enthusiastic states were viewed as compelling passionate states. The information from the study proposes that subjects consider passionate to be expressions as by and large prompt read-out of an unseen emotional condition. Decoding exactness compared with the physical power of expression for all disgust, sadness, and anger seem to be problematic in study. Bringing precision to the fore front did not relate to happiness. Happiness and joy were able to be recognized which we find proof of in a lot of past studies. This examination had some reliable point because the principles are available which can be related to advertising rules. Social standards exist in apparent and interpreting feelings presentations of others. Most studies again find a valuable understanding of happiness.

Other researchers Nele Dael, Marcello, and Klaus Scherer investigated finding out if subjects could separate and recognize feelings through body actions. There was an aggregate of 10 expert on-screen characters. The specialists embraced the body activity and stance coding framework which looks at the participants. Participants need to demonstrate 12 feelings. The study demonstrated that members could separate feelings and body pose. The subjects could separate feeling. Body stance probably won't be spoken to the equivalent in different societies. In another examination, there was a sum of 133 subjects. Hoffman and Kessler researched whether outward appearance was a precise method the convey. The women were more precise than men. The women could also coordinate feelings to confront. Both males and females take an interest could distinguish joy and shock the best. The study was all about outward appearance alone. Outward appearances are not by any means the only method to impart.

Researchers Klaus, Clark Polner, and Mortillaro looked into societies be able to recognizes and characterize feelings through the entire face. Klaus, Clark Polner, and Mortillaro found that there was not a lot of likeness and contrast however they likewise had a voice depicted in their study. The participants could interpret people feeling through their voice. Since we cannot all communicate in a similar language this would not help us communicate universally.

The study done by Wells, Gillespie, and Rothstein observed 7 outward appearances (neutral expression, happy, sad, angry, afraid, surprise, and disgust). There were 39 subjects from undergrad at a University in the UK. Every one of the subjects was from the UK. The subjects needed to coordinate faces to an expression. Now and then the faces on the screen had their mouths open and sometimes closed on the computer. In the investigation, women understood emotion interpretation better than men. Both males and females could recognize happy, however, sad was the least precise. Researchers concluded that participants paid more attention to the eyes than any other part of the face including the mouth. The study also showed that some emotion like happy were easier to recognize than other emotions like surprise and fear. This study was limited because the focus was only on the UK population. This study is not reliable for all culture’s ad backgrounds. In past studies there is some proof that intensity has some role in knowing someone’s emotions.

In conclusion, there are still enough arguments and research about understanding the power and manifestation of human emotions through body language and eye movements. Have the knowledge of someone’s emotions is an important trait because it inhibits a social interaction as well as a connection. Future researches will give us an understanding of emotions and how people can communicate with each other nonverbally. It will give humans a new way to communicate with all human life.