The Link Of Machiavellianism With Emotional Intelligence (EQ)

The link of machiavellianism with emotional intelligence (EQ) in fact, turned out to be negative. The statement that Machs have greater mental aptitudes whether it is IQ, EQ, or mind reading, is not supported by the data. Certainly, one should be careful about concluding from Machs readiness to manipulate others that, they are naturally expert at that job. As an alternative, it is said here that any manipulative skills that machiavellians have originate from greater impulse regulation instead of any superior cognitive skill (Jones & Paulhus, 2009). Sport students and athletes manipulate their opponents to gain victory and success.

The progressive literature proposes that young machiavellians may be healthy adjusted and even well respected (Hawley, 2003). Even as adults, they are occasionally chosen as leaders and debate partners (Coie & Kupersmidt, 1990). One moderating variable might be the social character for which the machiavellian is being rated. Wilson and colleagues (1998) showed that high Machs were perceived as less wanted for maximum forms of social interaction (e.g., good friend, confidant, business partner) but might be more wanted as debate partners. A current review by Wilson and colleagues (1996) offered a second likely moderating variable is time delay. They claimed that machiavellians follow short term manipulative social tactics and therefore fool some people some of the time, but repeatedly wrong-doings lead to bitterness and social elimination over time. Additionally, as described later, there is a clash in the idea that machiavellians choose short-term over long term policies (Jones & Paulhus, 2009).

Due to their manipulative predispositions, it might be surprising that Machs confess to antisocial behaviors in various self-report studies. Machs description that telling more lies in daily diary studies (Kashy & DePaulo, 1996), minor intentions in honoring the contracts that they have made (Forgas, 1998), and being more expected to reserve data that would harm them economically (Richardson & Thepaut, 2007). Machs would not account any of these antisocial predispositions if they anticipated that authorities might use the information against them (Jones & Paulhus, 2009).

Those high on machiavellian personality traits are constantly found to hold low levels of empathy (Ali & Chamorro-Premuzic, 2010). The research has differentiated cognitive empathy from affective empathy, and it looks for those high on machiavellian personality traits, the discrepancy might not be in general empathy, but somewhat restricted to affective empathy and emotional contagion (Wai & Tiliopoulos, 2012). Affective empathy usually states to emotional contagion and the proper emotional reaction in response to others emotions (Feshbach, 1987). Research has revealed that individuals high on machiavellian personality traits can show a higher level of affective perspective taking and a lower level of empathy (Barnett & Thompson, 1985). So, they are clever to recognize the feelings of others and possibly will know their victims experiences on a situational level but, not emotionally. This might allow individuals high on machiavellian personality traits to evaluate sensitive information from others and articulate plans, although managing or ignoring the harm imposed in the procedure. This is parallel to the idea of a “successful psychopath” (McHoskey et al., 1998). These type of machiavellian characteristics help the sport students to focus on their goals during play or competition.

Individuals high in machiavellian traits have been exposed to unaffected by the influence of others, have little interest in interpersonal closeness, cognitively orientated, and inspired by self-interest (Wastell & Booth, 2003). These traits are frequently observed as deficits with empathy and social cohesiveness being extremely wanted in several societal circumstances like during competition or play, these traits are extremely wanted by sport students or players for their success and to achieve their goals. But, the reason to empathize and be involved socially can come at a price in many situations. For example, one study found that counseling psychology graduate students scored high than their academic peers in machiavellian tactics. It is supposed that machiavellian tactics allow for more inventiveness along with fewer emotional involvement, which allows for better overall treatment and care (Christie & Geis, 1970).

In an emotionally charged situation involving face to face contact and authorizing freedom for improvisation, machiavellian individuals manipulate more, win more, are persuaded less, and persuade others more (Christie & Geis, 1970). Moreover, machiavellian traits can be useful in occasions where competition for resources is essential. In numerous situations, prosocial behavior is a suitable tool in obtaining prominent resources, mostly in a long-term policy. But, when those resources are rare, or supposed to be rare, obvious competition is frequently required (Sapolsky, 2005). Strategies connected with resource competition can include forced policies, used to force others to follow tactics or make others give or obtain resources. These behaviors might be a better match for individuals with machiavellian traits. Hawley (2003) states that the most effective source policy is the stability of prosociality and coercion, which she labels “bi-strategic resource controller.” This type of behavior has been observed in many age groups (Hawley et al., 2003).