Status of a Women and Their Chastity in Meausre for Measure

The status of a women is deemed by her chastity, wealth and sexualty.

Abstract

Measure for Measure play by William Shakespeare believed to have written in 1603 or 1604 . The play’s first recorded performance occurred in 1604. Shakespeare’s representation of women is his geniues. Mostly uses strong female characters in his novel. In personality the women in his plays may vary. Women characters in his play are mostly underestimated. His wit is however portrayed through them. Measure for Measure is set in Vienna. A city in which women in that period were objectified as sexual objects. Women in Vienna were effectively portrayed in terms of their sexuality and their relationship to men, which enabled the rulers to control them. The chastity of a Women defined her. She was expected to be pure till the night of her marriage. Also she had to get along with her dowry when given in marriage. The status of a women was measure by her chastity. Considered as the weaker section she also had the need to be protected. Clearly seen when Duke Vincentio comes for the rescue of Isabella. Not only this but a women’s fate is decided by the patriarchy.

Actual Paper

Being strong women and having their own viewpoints do they really have the need to be protected? Women having her own mind has been not given the status she deserves throughout the play Measure for Measure “ Isabella is seen having strong personality from the very begning she wants to become a nun. A decision taken and maintained throughout the play. She very well knows what is right and what is wrong. This can be clearly seen when she keeps her stand in front of her Angelo stating “For which I would not plead, but that I must, For which I must not plead, but that I am” She is well aware of the wrong done by his brother Claudio and knows she shouldn’t plead for his forgiveness yet of the love of her brother does. So what happens next is the questionable incident. Angelo having all authority and power wants Isabella to give upon her chastity and only then will be free his brother. Isn’t it an irony that he wants to commit the same sin for which he has put Claudio in prison. She is objectified as a means of gaining sexual pleasure. Claudio at first wants Isabella to give into Angelo so that he is free, is this what she deserves? Claudio can be seen as using her as a device to free himself.

However, her clear Standpoint and courage shown to be consistent on her decision makes Claudio change his mind. Isabella’s “no” has been a strong standpoint she maintained throughout the play. In the end of the play when the Duke proposes her for marriage her answer is “silence”. The silence she maintained in the end is again remarkable as it can be interpreted as a “No” to his question. There can be a possibility that she wants to get into “nummery ” the desire she has from the very begning. Yet it’s a questionable “silence” as it can be also seen as an unwanted yes that she will have to say because of the power and authority of Duke Vincentio. The whole idea as to why Duke Vicnetio saved Isabella from Angelo when disguised as a friar can be because of his own desire to get Isabella. Duke Vincentio is seen to be doing good for Isabella, helping her throughout however the status he has for a women is very contradicting.

On the other hand he was Mariana as a prey to to save Isabella. A women is made to give up on her chastity to save the chastity of another how does that can even be called a help. Instead he could just use his authority and exercise his powers and save Isabella and Mariana both. Mariana on the other hand is a women rejected by the Agnelo just because she lost her dowry is a shipwreck. So in this case she has been objectified as a means of gaining wealth. Duke Vincentio orders lucio to marry the women who has begotten his child. He immediately answers that she is a “whore”. That means he can use her as a ameans of gaining the pleasure he wants but cannot give the women the honor and dignity she deserves. So to put altogether the status a women has can be put up in one “patriarchy”. The only question that remains unresolved is how can Isabella being a women plan with friar allow Mariana to give into Angelo. Did she not thing for once that it is wrong for her to make another women do what she herself cannot imagine being put through. The measure of status given to a women by mean is clearly understood but the status of a women for another women is questionable.