State Nationalism in Iran & Turkey

During the inter-war period starting from 1920 to 1930, two countries Iran and Turkey faced many revolutionary reforms. These reforms completely changed the fate of these countries and it can be credited the success of both these countries in the modern world due to these radical reforms done by their great leaders. Ataturk modernized the Turkey’s legal and educational systems and encouraged the adoption of a European way of life, with Turkish written in the Latin alphabet and with citizens adopting European-style names. While Raza an Iranian army officer who rose through army ranks to become shah of Iran and began the regeneration of his country. Contrast study will be conducted in this essay on both these personalities’ reform policies that played a great role in the development of their countries. Reza Khan treasured recovering the Iranian country and driving it on the way of advancement. Many had envisioned that Reza Khan, whom they took to be an unsophisticated regimental officer, would be content with a high-sounding title and a sword of respect given by the shah.

In any case, he didn't settle on that and went further to work for his nation. Though after his crowning ritual in 1926, Shah proceeded with the extreme changes. He broke the intensity of the clans, which had been a violent component in the country, incapacitating and mostly settling them. In 1928 he put a conclusion to the uneven assertions and arrangements with remote forces, abrogating every exceptional benefit. He manufactured the Trans-Iranian Railway and began branch lines toward the foremost urban communities. He liberated ladies and expected them to dispose of their cover. He took control of the nation's accounts and correspondences, which up to then had been for all intents and purposes in outside hands. He manufactured streets, schools, and doctor's facilities and opened the primary college. His measures were coordinated in the meantime toward the democratization of the nation and its liberation from remote impedance. In his era Reza introduced new strategies in Iranian foreign policy that led him better relations with international powers also the economy of the country greatly flourished.

Discussing

Ataturk one can locate that subsequent to accepting office, Ataturk started a progression of radical changes in the nation's political, social, and monetary life that went for quickly changing Turkey into a cutting edge state. For him, transformation implied Westernization. On one level, a mainstream lawful code, displayed along European lines, was presented that totally changed laws influencing ladies, marriage, and family relations. On another level, Ataturk asked his compatriots to look and act like Europeans. Turks were urged to wear European chic garments. Ataturk by and by advanced formal dancing at authority capacities.

Moreover, Ataturk demanded cutting connections with the past that he thought about behind the times. Titles of respect were nullified. The wearing of the fez, which had been presented a century sooner as a modernizing change to supplant the turban, was banned in light of the fact that it had moved toward becoming for the patriots an image of the reactionary Ottoman administration. Ataturk reforms were mostly cultural based it was culture and social change faced by Turkish people in his era. It became evident that the reforms introduced by both of these great leaders led their countries on the path of progress. They understood the problems faced by their countries and wanted to do something in the matter. Their vision and intelligence corrected the old traditions and policies implemented in the country, and adopted Western policies to accomplish it.