Definiton of Civil Rights as an American Citizen

The phrase, civil rights refer to the responsibilities of the government to provide equal assurance and freedom from the taste for all citizens, the things that it must do. This event should not be involved with civil liberties, which point to the limits on government, or things it cannot do. Civil rights are rooted in the Fourteenth Amendment and its equal protection under the law. While most minorities have suffered discrimination in this country, the civil rights movement has had meaningful social and political outcomes, including comprehensive legislation that has secured important rights for all citizens. This event required an equal opportunity for the aspects of employment; set housing; the right to education, to vote equal entrance to the public facilities and being free from ethnic prejudice. Therefore, this paper will discuss civil rights movements, your civil rights as an American citizen plus how a civil case resulted in subsequent criminal charges.

The civil rights movement was a battle for social equity which happened commonly among the 1960s for blacks to raise equal rights under the law in the United States. The Civil War had authoritatively invalidated slavery, yet it didn't end victimization blacks—they kept on pursuing through the overwhelming impacts of bigotry, particularly in the South. By the mid-twentieth century, African Americans had all that could be needed of intolerance and viciousness against them. The social equality community was a period when the African Americans try was to gain their protected privileges of which they were being denied. An estimable heading of the social equality development was the unachievable triumph that the blacks looked for after and constructed. Through strength, diligence, and assurance, the African Americans won their autonomy. The social equality advancement was a period when the society was imprisoned ascended against the detriment and achieved their opportunity. Many were excited with how social equality development was being voted in the 1960s. The twentieth-century Civil Rights Movement developed as a reaction to the unfulfilled guarantees of liberation, mostly because of the encounters of dark troopers in the Second World War. African Americans battled in a separate military while being presented to US promulgation accentuating freedom, equity, and equity. After battling for vote based system in different nations around the globe, numerous African American veterans came back to the United States decided to accomplish the rights and privileges of full citizenship.

By the center of the twentieth century, dark individuals had since a long time ago endured through a physical and social scene of ethnic power, injected in approach, social codes, and both intimate and dynamite types of racial limitations and viciousness. The social and political appeal of Jim Crow, —the isolation of open positions—implied schools, methods of transportation, restrooms, and even gravesites was discrete and unequal. However, the catch-all expression 'Jim Crow' barely describes the arbitrary manages of dark specialists working cotton fields, landholders lost their property, dark ladies fighting off rape and assault, and the steady dangers of open difficulties, and the hang rope. These everyday imperatives were supported by fantasies about substandard dark characters and insight, duplicated in movies, books, radio projects, and magazine promotions. Jim Crow, savagery and ethnic confinement are constantly thought to be explicit to Dixie. Jim Crow cut over the limits of North and South. Somewhere in the range of 1940 and 1960, the Great Migration brought more than six million African Americans to modern focuses in the urban North and West, where vagrants were met with new types of racial regulation. They were frequently limited to household and retail administration work. The everyone who found modern works was kept out of the worker's guilds. Further, African Americans did not have the opportunity to pick where and how to live because of the impacts of state-supported prohibitive agreements—legitimately binding agreements making it unlawful to lease, sell, or rent lodging to dark everyone (in certain districts it added other 'nonwhites'). These limitations were put on both private land deals and open lodging arrangements. Eventually, the nonattendance of a 'free' lodging market discovered dark residents gaining the least wages and paying most elevated costs for most extremely terrible lodging stock.

Privileges preserve you of an unfair procedure under the law. As an American citizen, you have the right to live, to hold property, to liberty and the pursuit of happiness. first, your right to live is most important. It performs 'your' decisions on how you're going to be. It determines an occupation that's best for you, not the government has selected you should attempt. Your right to live lets you decide where you want to be, and the right to be what you wish. You can marry, have kids, or be single. The right to live is around individual rulings. second, your right to own property is an expansion of your right to live. It doesn't intend the government need to supply your property. You make a profit and then use it, however, you desire. Once you hold something, the government can't remove that from you. Notable differences are when you arrange to bankruptcy or get the property illegally. Further, democracy means freedom. Your legal civil right to freedom empowers you to be free of government control. Still, you must pay taxes also follow laws. Yet, the government can't require you to practice specific acts against your order, concerning the community at large. It can't show you that you obligation decides a behavior. You can select problems, including those that change the entire nation. Moreover, your right to happiness overlaps your right to live someway. That provides you the independence to seek alternatives that deliver you pleasure, entertainment, and self-fulfillment if you don't violate the rules. The government can't require you to be in the direction you hate. It can't inform you that you need to tribute your satisfaction for that welfare of your nation. Besides, there is also a civil right' attorney support such as the law investing civil rights and personality rights remain complex. However, there are some issues to civil rights enforcement if a part of the workforce is unprotected by civil rights law. The civil rights law provides for employee's protection against unfair and uncivil activities at the workplace. Yet, there is one community not explicitly protected under this law the LGBT community. Still, a gap remains in it, despite many amendments of the act affinity orientation discrimination. It is discrimination of whom one is attracted for personal relationships. Under civil rights, there is a provision which protects gender identity and sexual orientation to which workers from the LGBT community are much discriminated at the workplace. This event has led the community vulnerable as they don't enjoy the rights of the civil right act, particularly.

In an ordinary situation, a criminal lawsuit and civil lawsuit are two different things and basics are somewhat different, and civil disputes usually for money and criminal acts. A civil lawsuit involves two or more civilians, while a criminal lawsuit involves the law. While not impossible, it is unlikely that a civil lawsuit would turn into a criminal, unless given special circumstances. Further, crimes can be committed during a civil lawsuit that can result in criminal charges. If crimes are confessed to during a civil trial, criminal charges could be filed. However, a civil trial would not transform itself into a criminal trial. Furthermore, it happens the other way much. Most famous was a famous case, he was found innocent by a jury of the criminal charges of murdering Nicole Brown and Ronald Goldman. Then, the family of Ronald Goldman sued him civilly for wrongful death and assault of Ronald Goldman. Goldman family ended up winning that civil case and were awarded money of 33,500,000 dollars in damages. This event is called OJ case in short OJ Simpson. Anything verdict in a civil case is inadmissible in a similar case. This because the standards are much lower civil cases than in criminal cases. There can be both a criminal and civil case for things like assaults, fraud, rape or even murder, but the cases are tried separately and can easily have different outcomes. However, it often advisable to let the State prosecute for criminal charges first, if they can get a conviction, you can use that in your civil case (since the standards of a criminal case are higher than a civil case), and it makes things a lot easier win, or most likely settle out of court, and even if they cannot get a conviction like OJ case, the standard in a civil case is much lower and still have a chance of winning there. So, it depends on the circumstances and it is possible in the legal world.

In conclusion, as an American citizen, you have the right to live, to hold property, to life and the race of happiness. For ages, the civil rights movement was a battle for social equity which occurred most amid, the 1960s for blacks to increase equivalent rights under the law in the United States. The Civil War had authoritatively annulled bondage, yet it didn't end victimization blacks—they kept on persevering through the overwhelming impacts of bigotry, particularly in the South. Eventually, the nonattendance of a 'free' lodging market discovered dark occupants gaining the least wages and paying most elevated costs for most exceedingly terrible lodging stock. Now, there are still issues to civil rights enforcement if a part of the workforce is unprotected by civil rights law. Last but not least, a criminal lawsuit and civil lawsuit are two different things and basics are somewhat different, and civil disputes usually in money, and criminal acts