Exemplification of Social Psychology Theories in the Film "12 Angry Men"

Essay grade
Good
arrow downward Read Review
Words
682 (1 page)
Downloads
79
Download for Free
Essay grade
Good
arrow downward Read Review
Exemplification of Social Psychology Theories in the Film "12 Angry Men" essay
Important: This sample is for inspiration and reference only

Table of contents

We can get lot of social psychology theories example in the film “12 Angry Men”. Released in 1957 is a courtroom drama film directed by Sidney Lumet. It tells the story of 12 jurors who were assigned to decide the guilt or innocence of an accused murder. In the first time vote 11 jurors voted for guilty except one juror (Juror 8). Gradually, after lot of angry discussion among them all agreed the boy to be innocent. The film highlights the social psychology theories in areas of attitude formation and change, persuasion, cognitive dissonance, prejudice, social perception.

Social Perception and Prejudice

Juror 10 and Juror 3 has prejudice against the kid. Juror 10 has prejudice on the basis of social perception. He thinks the child is from slum and by default they are very violent and cannot live in the society respectfully. He was biased in his decision on the basis of this racial prejudice. He was third last person to change his decision to not guilty.

Juror 3 has personal experience with a kid like the accused. He had a bad relation with his own son and he no longer speak with him. This was a contributing factor to his prejudice against the defendant. 3rd Juror was the last to be convinced and he changed his mind only when other made him realized of his projected feelings of his son onto the defendant.

No time to compare samples?
Hire a Writer

✓Full confidentiality ✓No hidden charges ✓No plagiarism

Controlled and Automated processing

We can relate the movie discussion to our class discussion on scenario of violent crime in which Larry a school dropout shoots the policeman while coming out from liquor store. So, there can be motivational theories, learning theories or cognitive theories in the case of boy who was accused guilty of murdering his father. However initially the Jurors didn’t considered all these facts and 11 of them voted guilty. Here we can say that the modes of social thought were automatic processing. The Jurors thought in in a fast, relatively effortless, and intuitive manner. Juror 8 however thought in controlled process way. He analyzed each every juror thought and systematically and logically in a very effortful manner, he discussed the relevance of the witness testimony and disproves them all.

Informational Social Influence

There was also initially informational social influence. This had much worst effect on addition of time constraint. One jury had to attend ball game in the evening and he just wanted this to be over. Other jury who was businessman had some important meeting of him. One Juror only relied on other’s judgement. Majority influence played role in his decisions. He thought the society’s or majority’s group decision to be correct and changed his decision quickly as the majority changed from guilty to not guilty.

Attitude formation and Persuasion

Persuasion played a central role in the plot of “12 Angry Men”. According to social psychologists Richard Petty and John Cacioppo, there are two routes to persuasion: peripheral and central which are applicable here.

The central route to persuasion is the process by which a person thinks carefully about a communication and is influenced by the power of argument. We see the 8th Juror persuaded the other juror in a well-thought, elucidated manner. Juror 9 supported the Juror 8 on the basis of Juror’s passion and sense of justice. Lastly, a foreign juror appeals to the central route to persuasion when he advocates, “going deeper,” in reference to an examination of the facts. The peripheral route of persuasion is characterized by superficial cues surrounding the argument rather than the argument’s factual validity. This was used by 10th Jury giving prejudice and racist reason to support his decision and to persuade other.

Theory of attribution

Jones and Davis’s (1965) theory of correspondent inference says how we use information about others’ behavior as a basis for inferring their traits. Like jury who lived below the defendant house, said that in past the boy had tried to slash another teenager with knife, had an argument with his father and threatened his father to kill him. All these behavior made us to infer boy’s trait to impulsive and angry person who can murder someone. There were biases in attribution.

This essay is graded:
Good
minus plus
Expert Review
This essay critically examines the social psychology theories presented in the film "12 Angry Men," directed by Sidney Lumet in 1957. The author demonstrates a commendable understanding of various social psychology concepts such as attitude formation and change, persuasion, cognitive dissonance, prejudice, social perception, and attribution theory. The essay effectively integrates these theories into the context of the film's narrative, showcasing how they are exemplified by the characters' interactions and decisions during the jury deliberation process.
minus plus
What can be improved
While the essay provides a thorough analysis of the film's portrayal of social psychology theories, there are areas that could benefit from further elaboration and clarification. For instance, when discussing the concept of controlled and automated processing, the essay could delve deeper into how Juror 8's method of thinking contrasts with the other jurors' automatic processing. Providing specific examples from the film to illustrate each juror's thought process could enhance the analysis. Additionally, when discussing the theory of attribution, the essay could elaborate on how biases in attribution influenced the jurors' perceptions of the accused boy's traits. Including examples from the film to support these points would strengthen the argument. Furthermore, while the essay offers an insightful overview of the film's connections to various social psychology theories, it could benefit from a more engaging introduction that briefly outlines the plot and significance of "12 Angry Men." This would help contextualize the subsequent analysis for readers who may not be familiar with the film. Additionally, expanding on the implications of these social psychology theories in real-world scenarios or the broader implications of the film's messages could provide a more holistic perspective.
You can receive your plagiarism free paper on any topic in 3 hours!

*minimum deadline

Cite this Essay

To export a reference to this article please select a referencing style below

Copy to Clipboard
Exemplification of Social Psychology Theories in the Film “12 Angry Men”. (2020, November 02). WritingBros. Retrieved October 12, 2024, from https://writingbros.com/essay-examples/exemplification-of-social-psychology-theories-in-the-film-12-angry-men/
“Exemplification of Social Psychology Theories in the Film “12 Angry Men”.” WritingBros, 02 Nov. 2020, writingbros.com/essay-examples/exemplification-of-social-psychology-theories-in-the-film-12-angry-men/
Exemplification of Social Psychology Theories in the Film “12 Angry Men”. [online]. Available at: <https://writingbros.com/essay-examples/exemplification-of-social-psychology-theories-in-the-film-12-angry-men/> [Accessed 12 Oct. 2024].
Exemplification of Social Psychology Theories in the Film “12 Angry Men” [Internet]. WritingBros. 2020 Nov 02 [cited 2024 Oct 12]. Available from: https://writingbros.com/essay-examples/exemplification-of-social-psychology-theories-in-the-film-12-angry-men/
Copy to Clipboard
Exemplification of Social Psychology Theories in the Film "12 Angry Men" essay

Need writing help?

You can always rely on us no matter what type of paper you need

Order My Paper

*No hidden charges

/